Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 8, 1929No. A-6857PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Cleveland county on a charge of having possession of in toxicating liquor, and Ms punishment fixed at a fine of flOO and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days.

In the trial of the case the state offered in evidence the affidavit upon which the search warrant was obtained, to which the defendant made the following objection:

“By Mr. Luttrell: Comes now the defendant, the County Attorney having read to the jury over the objections of the defendant the affidavit for search warrant, and moves the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Weeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Clasby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Plumlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API