Legal Opinion

Town of Davis v. Thomason

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1928No. 17408PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Defendant in error filed his action in the district court of Murray county for damages against plaintiff in error caused by the negligence of plaintiff in error in the construction and operation of its septic tank in connection with its sewer system in proximity to the farm of defendant in error, and from the verdict of the jury and judgment in favor of defendant in error, plaintiff below, the town of Davis, prosecutes this appeal.

Counsel for plaintiff in error presents his assignments of error under three propositions, the first of which is that the court erred in refusing to give an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. GrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. City of Mangum v. Sun Set FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. City of Lawton v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. New v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. City of Lawton v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Shawnee National Bank v. D. S. Miser & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API