Legal Opinion
Hemphill v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2009-0004Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ALLEGRA D. HEMPHILL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-4 (RMC) ) KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION ) and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is the latest chapter in pro se Plaintiff Allegra D. Hemphill’s never-ending litigation against Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Procter & Gamble Company. Ms. Hemphill has filed numerous patent infringement lawsuits against Defendants, none of which has been successful. Citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) and (b)(6), Ms. Hemphill alleges in her…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.