Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. William K. Reilly, Administrator and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
The Petitioner, Wisconsin Electric Power Company (“WEPCO”), challenges two final determinations issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”). In these determinations, the EPA concluded that WEPCO’s proposed renovations to its Port Washington power plant would subject the plant to certain pollution control provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. (1982). We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand to the EPA.
I. The Underlying Dispute
A. Relevant Provisions of the Clean Air Act
Some discussion of the Clean Air Act is required…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West Virginia v. EPASupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Enviro Tech International, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Hoffman Homes, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Hoffman Group v. Administrator, United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.