Legal Opinion

Lansdale v. Hammond

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1994No. 80866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*434 OPINION

GARRETT, Vice Chief Judge:

This appeal results from a judgment declaring a minor child, D.R.W., eligible for adoption without the consent of her natural mother.

In February 1990, Ronald and Debra Hammond (collectively, Hammond) filed an action seeking an order declaring D.R.W. eligible for adoption without the consent of her natural parents. 10 O.S.1991 § 60.6 provides:

A child under eighteen (18) years of age cannot be adopted without the consent of its parents, if living, except that consent is not required from:

⅜ * sj: * ⅜ ⅜(2) A parent who, for a period of twelve (12) months…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Matter of Chad S.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. In Re BomgardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Matter of T.M.H.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Merrell v. MerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of G.D.J.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Dolbow v. BeamerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. In Re Adoption of GdjSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API