Legal Opinion

Dolbow v. Beamer

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 20, 1997No. 86031Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOPLIN, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellants Thomas E. Dolbow, II, (Father) and Elisha Dolbow (Wife) seek review of the trial court’s order holding Appellants not entitled to adopt Appellant Father’s *257biological child, B.N.D., without the consent of B.N.D.’s biological mother, Appellee Dolly Dolbow Beamer (Mother). In this appeal, Appellants assert that Mother’s failure to pay child support pursuant to Mother and Father’s divorce decree rendered unnecessary her consent to adoption of B.N.D. by Father’s new wife, and that in any event, the trial court’s failure to appoint independent counsel…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. In Re the Adoption of Darren Todd H.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Merrell v. MerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Adoption of J.R.M. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API