Legal Opinion

People v. Ranney

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1931No. Docket No. Crim. 3422PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted by this court in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal in order to give further consideration to some of the matters discussed therein. The facts of the case, so far as it is necessary to recount them on this appeal, are as follows:

The defendant was charged with twenty-one counts of grand theft, and with having been twice previously convicted of a felony. Upon defendant pleading not guilty to the various charges of grand theft, a trial by jury was had, resulting in a conviction on seven of the counts charged in the indictment, the jury being…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. CarrollIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. CarmichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. People v. ArlingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. ManleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. CroweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. People v. GillilandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API