Legal Opinion
Winkle v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1923No. 6285PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were on a trial to a jury found guilty of contempt of court, having been charged by information with violating an injunction granted by the court below in an equity cause pending therein entitled Chicago & Alton Railway Co. v. International Association of Machinists et al. The terms of the injunction, alleged to have been violated, set out in the information, are:
“Not to interfere in any manner with the employees of the complainant in going to and from their daily work or in remaining at such work, except by such peaceful persuasion as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Wiggins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- MacDaniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Rossini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- McCourtney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.