Legal Opinion

Moore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1932No. 530PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Tom A. Moore, Bert Hudlow, Sam Hudlow, and Tom Hudlow were indicted for violations of the Hastings Amendment (25 US CA § 244), and sections 3 and 25, Title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27. USCA §§ 12, 39). Moore was convicted of counts 2 and 3 and sentenced. He has appealed.

Count 2 charged Moore and his codefendants with the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Count 3 charged them with possession of property and materials designed and intended for use in the manufacture of intoxicating liquor.

The Government’s evidence disclosed that on the night of February 16,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. GottfriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Earl Elmer Gravatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  3. Billy Ray Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  4. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. United States v. Carson William Steel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API