Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Craig Crockett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.
Craig Crockett’s law firm signed an adhesion contract with LexisNexis that contained an arbitration clause. Eventually the parties had a billing dispute. The arbitration clause provided that any arbitration with respect to LexisNexis’s charges must occur in the city where Lex-isNexis is located. That provision and others made arbitration of Crockett’s individual claims economically unfeasible, so Crockett filed an arbitration demand on behalf of himself and a putative class of other LexisNexis customers. But the arbitration clause says nothing about class-wide…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- AlixPartners v. Charles BrewingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Harley Blanton v. Domino's Pizza Franchising LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC v. Scout Petroleum, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
- JPay, Inc. v. Cynthia KobelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.