Legal Opinion

State v. Mastaler

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 7, 1971No. 108-71PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

This is a petition for a writ of extraordinary relief (certiorari) brought by the state’s attorney for the County of Windham. Its purpose is to review the proceedings in the District Court, Unit No. 6, Windham- Circuit, brought against the petitionee on the question of the suspension of his operator’s license under what is known as the “implied consent law”, 23 V.S.A. §§ 1201-1210. The suspension action followed petitionee’s arrest on a charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. After hearing, the court entered a judgment adverse to the state, ruling…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Donoghue v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  3. Medlar v. Aetna Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  4. State v. DellveneriSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  5. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  2. State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. State v. LundSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. Veilleux v. SpringerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API