Clarke v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAN CLARKE, Case No. 20-cv-04629-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS CLEAN WATER ACT CLAIM 10 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 11 Defendants. 12 13 Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company and PG&E Corporation (collectively 14 “PG&E”) move to dismiss plaintiff Dan Clarke’s Clean Water Act (“CWA”) cause of action on 15 the grounds that it is barred by the statute of limitations and is insufficiently pleaded to establish 16 subject matter jurisdiction. But in Clarke’s First…