Victor George Bryant v. William R. Muth Gregg Robbins
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge:
Prison officials William R. Muth (“Muth”) and Gregg Robbins (“Robbins”) are appealing the district court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment and finding that they were not entitled to qualified immunity for the confiscation of inmate Victor George Bryant’s legal materials created with the unauthorized use of prison computers and stored on contraband computer disks. We disagree, reverse, and grant the defendants’ motion for summary judgment finding that they are entitled to qualified immunity.
I
On November 13, 1987, prison officials at the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Oxendine v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Henry v. PurnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Jeffery Stanton v. Cory ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Hodge v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Bradley v. RamseyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Dent v. Montgomery County Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.