Legal Opinion

Protest 48640-K of Ti Hang Lung & Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided March 24, 1944No. 49288Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The only witness was the United States examiner who testified that the merchandise was “just dry frog; whole frogs, dried.” The court was of the opinion from a review of decisions that the collector’s classification was incorrect inasmuch as the court has held that frogs are not meats (Pacific Trading Co. v. United States, 8 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 610) and no decision relating to dried frogs had come to its attention. The evidence was further held not sufficient to show that dried frogs are raw or unmanufactured articles and it was assumed, therefore, that labor was used in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pacific Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. United States v. Kagawa & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Pacific Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API