Legal Opinion

Pacific Trading Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 13, 1940No. C. D. 335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, Judge:

This is an action against the United States wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover certain sums of money claimed to have been unlawfully exacted on an importation of merchandise entered as frozen headless frogs at the port of San Francisco. The commodity involved originated in Japan. It was classified by the collector as “game, not specially provided for” under paragraph 704 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 6 cents a pound. Plaintiff claims it is properly dutiable at 10 or 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the same law as unenumerated articles, or under paragraph 717…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. General Hide & Skin Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pacific Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  5. Protest 48640-K of Ti Hang Lung & Co.United States Customs Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API