Legal Opinion

State v. Day

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1990No. C8-90-751PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

In a proceeding leading to conviction of appellant for driving after revocation, the trial court admitted evidence obtained after a police officer pulled in near appellant at a gas station, exited his squad car, and summoned appellant to approach his squad car to provide identification and to respond to questioning. Appellant contends the officer’s conduct constituted a restraint under the fourth amendment and the officer’s actions occurred without articulable cause. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

A Virginia, Minnesota police officer stopped to the left of appellant’s car at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. KlamarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. HjelmstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. PfannensteinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API