Legal Opinion
State v. Pfannenstein
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 27, 1994No. C5-94-862PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
After denial of a motion to suppress evidence, appellant was convicted of gross misdemeanor DWI and driving after cancellation, a misdemeanor. See Minn.Stat. §§ 169.121, subd. 1(a), (d), (e), subd. 3(c), and 171.24 (1992). This appeal is from the judgment of conviction. We affirm.
FACTS
Officer Chris Aleshire was on patrol in Waite Park when his attention was drawn to a flickering headlight. He approached, finding a man on a motorcycle trying to start the bike. Officer Aleshire’s police report, which was the substance of the facts stipulated by the parties, describes what…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MartinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. BrunelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Kranz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995