Legal Opinion
Silverton v. Valley Transit Cement Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 7, 1955No. 1485PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
This cause having come before the Court for hearing on defendants’ motion filed October 31, 1955, to dismiss the action, and plaintiff’s motion filed November 16, 1955, to amend his complaint to join the claimant employees as co-plaintiffs; and the motions having been submitted for decision; and it appearing to the Court:(1) That this action was commenced on March 27, 1953, by the plaintiff, “Beaumont Silverton, individually and as a member, representative and Secretary of Teamsters Local Union No. 898, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Matheny v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Hamilton Foundry & MacHine Co. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers Union of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- United Protective Workers of America v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- La Guardia v. Austin-Bliss General Tire Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Silverton v. Valley Transit Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- State of Nevada Employees' Ass'n v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mitchell v. Mace Produce Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
- United Steelworkers, Local Union No. 4264 v. New Park Mining Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1958
- Silverton v. Valley Transit Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.