Legal Opinion
La Guardia v. Austin-Bliss General Tire Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 20, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to strike from the defendant’s answer the denial of the allegations of paragraph II of the complaint and also the second and seventh affirmative defenses. The action is brought under the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938”, U. S.C.A.Title 29, Sections 201-219, by the assignee of certain of defendant’s employees to recover unpaid overtime compensation.
Paragraph II of the complaint alleges that jurisdiction is conferred upon the court by Section 41(8) of Title 28 of the U.S.C.A. and by Section 16(b) of the Act, Section 216(b) of Title 29 U.S. C.A. It is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Lefevers v. General Export Iron & Metal Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
- Campbell v. Superior Decalcominia Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
- Hargrave v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re FerkaufDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Hays v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Silverton v. Valley Transit Cement Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- McNichols v. Lennox Furnace Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.