Legal Opinion
People v. Ramos
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1995PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*681OPINION OF THE COURT
Levine, J.
The issues on these appeals are whether in a criminal appeal taken by the People, due process mandates that the defendant be personally served with the People’s brief and, if not, whether the Appellate Division, First Department, may adopt such a requirement pursuant to its rule-making authority.1 We hold that due process does not require that the defendant be personally served with the People’s appellate briefs and that the Appellate Division acted outside its rule-making authority in adopting such a rule. Consequently, we reverse the Appellate Division orders…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- People v. BachertNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Brusco v. BraunNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- The People v. Jose AvilesNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re Estate of PoldrugovazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Sing W.C. Sing Y.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WaiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.