People v. Robinson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
In each case, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendants contend that the Appellate Division violated their appellate due process rights when it denied their requests for access to grand jury minutes. As a threshold matter, a party seeking disclosure of grand jury minutes must establish a compelling and particularized need for them. Only then must the court balance various factors to assess, in its discretion, whether disclosure is appropriate under the circumstances presented (People v Fetcho, 91 NY2d 765, 769 [1998]; Matter of Lungen v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re District AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. FetchoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lungen v. KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by34 opinions
- The People v. Jose Martinez BaxinNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. Eun Sil JangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Anilao v. SpotaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- People v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- James v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.