Legal Opinion

Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 27, 2011No. 09SA352PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

In 2006, the Upper Yampa Water Conser-vancey District (the "District") filed an application for absolute water rights, based on their conditional water rights on Four Counties Ditch Number 8 ("Four Counties Rights"). The State Engineer and Division Engineer, Water Division 6 (the "Engineers") opposed the application and moved for summary judgment. The water court denied the Engineers' motion, but ruled as a matter of law that in order to perfect a conditional water storage right, the District must show "actual" beneficial use of a specific amount of water. The water court additionally held…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. West Elk Ranch, L.L.C. v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Vidler Tunnel Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority v. WolfeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  2. Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority in the Eagle River in Eagle County, Colorado: Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority v. WolfeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. St. Jude's Co. v. Roaring Fork Club, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. St. Jude's Co. v. Roaring Fork Club, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API