Legal Opinion

West Elk Ranch, L.L.C. v. United States

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 2, 2002No. 02SA93PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

I. Introduction

In this case, West Elk Ranch (“West Elk” or “the Ranch”) and its predecessors-in-in*480terest sought a conditional water right to a spring located on adjacent National Forest land. The Forest Service denied a Special Use Permit (“SUP”) that would have allowed West Elk to capture the water on Forest land and divert it onto West Elk’s property. Accordingly, the water court granted summary judgment for the United States, denying the conditional water right because West Elk could not then meet the “can and will” requirement established for the issuance of conditional water rights. See…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. BieleckiColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Martini v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Tonko v. MallowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Pulte Home Corp. v. Countryside Cmty. Ass'n, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. General Security Indemnity Co. of Arizona v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Natural Energy Resources Co. v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. Henisse v. First Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API