Legal Opinion
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Lucentsucks. Com
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 3, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-1916-APublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant lucentsucks.com’s [sic] to Dismiss the Complaint, in which defendant argues that plaintiffs failure to comply with the requirements of the recently enacted Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act mandates dismissal of the complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Lucent Technologies, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Murray Hill, New Jersey. It has filed this in rem action against the domain name lucentsucks.com under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Grunin v. International House of PancakesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. L & L Wings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mayflower Transit, LLC v. PrinceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- America Online, Inc. v. Chih-Hsien HuangDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Heathmount A.E. Corp. v. Technodome.comDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Solid Host, NL v. Namecheap, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Sunlight Saunas, Inc. v. Sundance Sauna, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.