Legal Opinion

Tooahnippah v. Hickel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 27, 1970No. 300Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

397 U.S. 598 (1970)

TOOAHNIPPAH (GOOMBI), ADMINISTRATRIX, ET AL.

v.

HICKEL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.

No. 300.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 14, 1970

Decided April 27, 1970

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.

Omer Luellen argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.

Richard B. Stone argued the cause for respondent Hickel, pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Kashiwa, Edmund B. Clark, and Robert S. Lynch. Houston Bus Hill argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent Horse.

2Opinion of the Court · BurgerChief Justice Burger

We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. City of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API