Legal Opinion

Reliance Insurance Company v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1985No. 84-1222PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge:

Reliance Insurance Company (Reliance) brought this action against St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company (St. Paul) to recover one half of the amount Reliance paid to a mutual insured in settlement of a property damage claim. On submitted briefs, the district court found that where a property loss is covered by two insurance policies, both containing excess clauses, the loss should be apportioned on a pro rata basis according to the amount of coverage provided by each insurer. Thus, due to the fact that St. Paul’s coverage was one-thirtieth that of Reliance’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Jones v. Medox, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Insurance Co. of Texas v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. Ruan Transport Corporation v. Truck Rentals, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Stonewall Insurance v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Mission Insurance v. United States Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Noland v. Virginia Insurance ReciprocalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. National Electrical Manufacturers Association v. Gulf Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API