Reliance Insurance Company v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge:
Reliance Insurance Company (Reliance) brought this action against St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company (St. Paul) to recover one half of the amount Reliance paid to a mutual insured in settlement of a property damage claim. On submitted briefs, the district court found that where a property loss is covered by two insurance policies, both containing excess clauses, the loss should be apportioned on a pro rata basis according to the amount of coverage provided by each insurer. Thus, due to the fact that St. Paul’s coverage was one-thirtieth that of Reliance’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Jones v. Medox, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Insurance Co. of Texas v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Ruan Transport Corporation v. Truck Rentals, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Stonewall Insurance v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Mission Insurance v. United States Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Noland v. Virginia Insurance ReciprocalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- National Electrical Manufacturers Association v. Gulf Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.