Legal Opinion

Mission Insurance v. United States Fire Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 11, 1988PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

The plaintiff, Mission Insurance Company (Mission), seeks a declaration under G. L. c. 231 A, § 1 (1986 ed.), that the defendant, United States Fire Insurance Company (U.S. Fire), must contribute to a tort claim settlement negotiated by Mission and two primary insurers. On cross motions for summary judgment, a Superior Court judge agreed *493with U.S. Fire’s view that the insurance provided by U.S. Fire is excess of that provided by Mission, and therefore U.S. Fire need not contribute to the settlement until the Mission policy is exhausted. We granted Mission’s application for direct appellate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Fireside Motors, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. August A. Busch & Co. of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Boston Gas Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Transamerica Insurance Group v. Turner Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API