Legal Opinion

Square Deal Gold Mining Co. v. Colomo Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 7, 1916No. 8532PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Gilpin District Court. Hon. H. S. Class, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

The defendant in error brought suit, as the owner of the Sub Treasury Lode Mining Claim, and the Cecil .Lode Mining Claim, to quiet title to. such claims, including certain portions of the veins, which, having their apices within said claims, had, on their dip, passed outside of the south sideline thereof.

The parties will be here designated as they were in the trial court.

The complaint alleged title in plaintiff, and possession, “except fox trespasses hereinafter mentionedand that the defendant, owning a claim to the south of plaintiff’s ground, had been working,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodrum v. AyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  2. Mitchell v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Gutheil Park Investment Co. v. Town of MontclairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  4. Sanders v. Village of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  5. Mulford v. RowlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haymaker v. Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Clayton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  3. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1947
  4. Cornucopia Leasing, Mining & Milling Co. v. KenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Drummond v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API