Legal Opinion

Gutheil Park Investment Co. v. Town of Montclair

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1904No. 4444PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The subject-matter of the controversy is a water right for irrigation purposes. The action is equitable in its nature. The complaint has some of the characteristics of a bill to quiet title, and some of the features of a suit to prevent a disturbance or obstruction of a right to use the water for irrigation and to require a transfer of its place of use. The complaint when filed, named as defendants the Town of Montclair and The Northern Colorado Irrigation Company. It contained two causes of action, the allegations of the first of which were directed particularly .against the town, those of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Grand Valley Irrigation Co. v. LesherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Navajo Development Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Lambert v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Haymaker v. Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Clayton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Blanchard v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API