Lower Bartlett Water Precinct v. Murnik
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The respondents, twenty-six registered voters in the Lower Bartlett Water Precinct, appeal the order of the Superior Court (Vaughan, J.) declaring their petition for repeal of the Lower Bartlett Water Precinct Land Use Ordinance (zoning ordinance) defective and denying their requests for mandamus and attorney’s fees. We reverse in part and remand.
The relevant facts follow. The petitioner, the Lower Bartlett Water Precinct (Precinct), is a village district in the town of Bartlett, established to provide water services to town residents. It holds an annual meeting on the second Tuesday in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKinney v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Mahoney v. Town of CanterburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Smagula v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- New Hampshire Department of Health & Human Services v. BonserSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- LaChance v. United States Smokeless Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Cui v. Chief, Barrington Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007