Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Town of Canterbury
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 14, 2003No. 2002-638PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The plaintiffs, Catherine and Everett S. Mahoney, appeal orders of the Superior Court (.Fitzgerald, J.) finding that Old Still Road is a class VI highway established by prescription under RSA 229:1 and awarding damages to defendant, Fortin & Redmond Associates (F & R). F & R cross-appeals the amount of damages awarded. We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand.
The trial court found the following facts. The road in question is Old Still Road, located in the northwest corner of Canterbury. Old Still Road extends approximately one-half mile north from Intervale Road, which follows the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Flanagan v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Catalano v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Cross v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Robert E. Tardiff, Inc. v. Twin Oaks Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McIntyre v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Blagbrough Family Realty Trust v. a & T Forest Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Czumak v. New Hampshire Division of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Gill v. GerratoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Gill v. GerratoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.