Legal Opinion

Cui v. Chief, Barrington Police Department

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 15, 2007No. 2006-430PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DALIANIS, J.

The defendant, the Chief of the Barrington Police Department, appeals an order of the Rochester District Court (DiMeo, J.) finding the Town of Barrington (Town) liable to the plaintiff, Dan Cui, pursuant to the Dog Control Law, RSA 466:30-a (Supp. 2006). Because the statute neither expressly nor impliedly imposes liability upon the Town, and no common law duty is otherwise implicated under these particular circumstances, we hold that the district court’s order was erroneous as a matter of law and reverse.

The plaintiff filed a small claims action seeking $1,452.00…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doucette v. Town of Bristol & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Island Shores Estates Condominium Ass'n v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. Lower Bartlett Water Precinct v. MurnikSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MacIe v. HelmsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. Banfield Realty LLC, Plaintiff v. William E. Copeland; Jack Copeland; Joseph P. Copeland; Roeseland Holdings 5, LLC; James W. Copeland; Country Motor Sales; Mountjoy & Carlisle, LLC d/b/a Olde Port Properties; George M. Carlisle; Jeffrey Mountjoy; Wayne Semprini; City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire; and Portsmouth Housing Authority, DefendantsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  3. William Soler Justice v. Christopher T. Sununu et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024
  4. Banfield Realty LLC v. CopelandDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  5. Justice v. Governor, NH, State ofDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API