Legal Opinion

Dargen v. King

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1987No. A8501-00365; CA A40341PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*351ROSSMAN, J.

Plaintiff brought this action as guardian ad litem for his minor dáughter to recover damages for injuries sustained when she was bitten by defendants’ dog. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and entered judgment accordingly. We reverse.

In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants were negligent in failing properly to supervise and control their dog, that the dog attacked his daughter when she was a visitor in defendants’ home, that defendants were aware of their dog’s vicious propensities and that, as a result of the attack, his daughter suffered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Westberry v. BlackwellOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sheppard v. WeeklyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Dowd v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Hickey v. SettlemierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Naumes, Inc. v. Landmark InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Dargen v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API