Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnes v. Mitchell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1954No. Docket 54, Calendar 46,046Published

1DissentSharpe, J.

In coming to my conclusions in this case I must take into consideration the following established facts: The cause of action is planted upon the action rendered by Bonnie Ester-brook on October 6, 1948, in giving plaintiff an X-ray treatment in the office of the defendant; that Bonnie Esterbrook had never assisted defendant in giving X-ray treatments to plaintiff; that she was never authorized to give plaintiff an X-ray treatment ; and that prior to the above date she had never given plaintiff an X-ray treatment.

' It is also well established that the operation oían X-ray machine can only be…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Brinkman v. ZuckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Riley v. RoachMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API