Barnes v. Mitchell
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentSharpe, J.
In coming to my conclusions in this case I must take into consideration the following established facts: The cause of action is planted upon the action rendered by Bonnie Ester-brook on October 6, 1948, in giving plaintiff an X-ray treatment in the office of the defendant; that Bonnie Esterbrook had never assisted defendant in giving X-ray treatments to plaintiff; that she was never authorized to give plaintiff an X-ray treatment ; and that prior to the above date she had never given plaintiff an X-ray treatment.
' It is also well established that the operation oían X-ray machine can only be…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Brinkman v. ZuckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Riley v. RoachMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.