Legal Opinion

INTERSHOP COMMUNICATIONS, AG v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2002No. A098878PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

127 Cal.Rptr.2d 847 (2002)

104 Cal.App.4th 191

INTERSHOP COMMUNICATIONS, AG, et al., Petitioners,

v.

The SUPERIOR COURT of the City and County of San Francisco, Respondent;

Frank R. Martinez, Real Party in Interest.

No. A098878.

Court of Appeal, First District, Division Five.

December 10, 2002.

Review Denied March 26, 2002.[*]

Rehearing Denied January 7, 2003.

Craig S. Ritchey, Karen E. Wentzel, Patricia A. Welch, Palo Alto, Ritchey, Fisher, Whitman & Klein Dennis M. Sullivan, San Francisco, Counsel for Petitioners and Defendants.

Robert D. Bjork, Jr., Oakland, David M. Poore, Bjork Lawrence, Counsel for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hunt Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Supreme Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Morris v. Redwood Empire BancorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Aral v. Earthlink, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Net2Phone, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API