Legal Opinion

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Clary

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 23, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Callaway. Columbia superior court. March term, 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

The charge set out in the headnote is clearly erroneous when taken in connection with the facts disclosed in the record. Relatively to a person or thing on a railroad-track, one hundred and thirty-five yards beyond the crossing, it is not negligence per se for the servant of the railroad company to .fail to check the train and blow the whistle before arriving at the crossing. Air-Line R. Co. v. Gravitt, 93 Ga. 369; Central R. Co. v. Golden, Ibid. 510. A failure to check the train and to blow the whistle is admissible in evidence and may be considered by the jury, as was held in both of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. West End & Atlanta Street Railway Co. v. MozelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Huckabee v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Mayor of Milledgeville v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McBryarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Augusta-Aiken Railway & Electric Corp. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API