Legal Opinion

Target Corporation v. ACE American Insurance Company

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 22, 2022No. 0:19-cv-02916Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Target Corporation, Case No. 19-cv-2916 (WMW/DTS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. ACE American Insurance Company and ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Defendants. Before the Court is Plaintiff Target Corporation’s (Target) motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(f)(2) and 59(e). (Dkt. 51.) Defendants ACE American Insurance Company and ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (collectively, ACE) oppose the motion. For the reasons addressed below, the Court grants Target’s motion to alter or amend the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Sovereign Bank v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API