Legal Opinion
Hollywood State Bank v. Wilde
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 10, 1945No. Civ. 14717PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
These actions were consolidated for trial. They had been instituted for the purpose of enforcing the payment of the balance of a $20,000 promissory note of the Chapman Chinchilla Sales Company, hereinafter referred to as the “Company,” which had pledged to plaintiff certain contracts executed severally by respondents for the purchase of chinchillas. The defendants prevailed below upon the defenses that the contracts and their assignments were void in that they were made and assigned in violation of the Corporate Securities Act and of the federal Securities Act of 1933. On this appeal by the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- People v. YantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Penfield Co. of Cal. v. Securities and Exch. Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Silver Hills Country Club v. SobieskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. SydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Clejan v. ReismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. WitzermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.