Legal Opinion

Salman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 31, 2005No. 05-200 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

BUSH, Judge.

This case is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed on April 11, 2005, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The government contends, inter alia, that the complaint fails to allege a “money-mandating constitutional provision, statute or regulation providing Tucker Act[, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (2000),] jurisdiction,” Def.’s Mot. at 7, and that Mr. Salman has not alleged facts which would give rise to jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1495 (2000).1 For the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Zakiya v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Bolduc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Jefferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Ilaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API