Legal Opinion

North Birmingham American Bank v. Realty Mortgage Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 6 Div. 902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The bill of complaint, before and after amendment, is not a general creditor’s hill and merely seeks to set aside a conveyance from Watford, the debtor, to his wife as voluntary and subordinate to the complainant’s claim, and it seems that such a bill is permissible. Tissier v. Wailes (Ala. Sup.) 39 So. 924; Eaton v. Patterson & Hinchman, 2 Stew. & P. 9. And the creditor first filing the bill and obtaining process acquires the prior lien, which would prevail against creditors subsequently coming in. Mathews v. Mobile Mutual Ins. Co., 75 Ala. 85. This applies, of course, as to other creditors…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. Mobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Bartee v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Durr v. Hanover National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Wise v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Ark-Ala Lumber Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Cortner v. GalyonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Harris v. First Nat. Bank of TuscumbiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Bishop v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Anderton v. HiterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API