Legal Opinion

Bishop v. McPherson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1936No. 6 Div. 865PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The bill in this cause was filed by ap-pellee, P. L. McPherson, to have a certain instrument executed by the respondents Ruby G. Bishop and her husband, C. M. Bishop, to the complainant, declared and enforced as an equitable mortgage on the lands described in the bill; or, in the alternative, to have a decree of the court subrogating the complainant to the lien of the “original vendor” of said property for the amount advanced by the complainant for the purchase of said property; and to have a certain purported mortgage executed by the said respondents Ruby G. Bishop and her…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Evans v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Wood v. Holly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Newlin, Fernley & Co. v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. Beall & Coston v. Lehman Durr Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Courtner v. EtheredgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnett v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Horan v. HoranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Murphy v. CarriganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API