Legal Opinion
Forrester v. Denny
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 15, 1929No. 7296PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
An order passed by the judge, as follows: “After hearing had upon the within petition, the restraining order heretofore passed in this cause is dissolved,” is not a judgment refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction, and affords no basis for a writ of error. Putnam Mills & Power Co. v. Stonecypher, 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87) ; Bradfield v. Abercrombie, 151 Ga. 401 (107 S. E. 45); Touchton v. Henderson, 158 Ga. 819 (124 S. E. 529) ; Kennedy v. Edenfield, 159 Ga. 816 (126 S. E. 779); Shirley v. Standard Oil Co., 169 Ga. 300.
Writ of error dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Putnam Mills & Power Co. v. StonecypherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Touchton v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bradfield v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Kennedy v. EdenfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Shirley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Wofford Oil Co. v. City of NashvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Barrett v. American Securities Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Druggists Co-Operative Ice-Cream Inc. v. CraveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Butters Manufacturing Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.