Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J.D.F.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 18, 1996No. 95-1545PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

This appeal arises from the district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The evidence was obtained by police officers from defendant, a juvenile, while in custody. We affirm.

I.Factual and Procedural Background

On November 21, 1994, a call came over the police radio that a juvenile had been seen carrying a weapon and was attempting to put an ammunition clip into it. Sergeant William Judkins responded to the call and approached defendant JDF, who was standing on the street comer and met the description sent over the radio. Judkins observed what he thought to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State of Iowa v. Robert Dale Lowe, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In the Interest of J.A.L.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API