People v. Henderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contentions, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495; People v Smith, 157 AD2d 810, lv denied 75 NY2d 970). In addition, contrary to defendant’s further contention, there is not a “ ‘grave risk that an innocent [person] has been convicted’ ” (People v Carter, 63 NY2d 530, 536, quoting People v Kidd, 76 AD2d 665, 668, lv dismissed 51 NY2d 882). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. KiddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. FehrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. EchevarriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- ECHEVARRIA, CARMELO, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. EchevarriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. LazartesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.