Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Lazartes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 2005Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGoldstein, J.

to affirm the defendant’s convictions of reckless driving and driving without a license, and to order a new trial with respect to all the remaining counts of which the defendant was convicted, with the following memorandum, in which Florio, J.E, concurs: I concur with the majority that the defendant is entitled to a new trial because of trial errors. However, I disagree with the conclusion of the majority that the counts of the indictment charging the defendant with murder in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the first degree upon the theory that he acted with depraved…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. RegisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. KibbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API