Legal Opinion

Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2000No. 25562PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SERNA, Justice.

{1} Defendant-Petitioner Chrysler Motors Corporation (Chrysler) filed a cost bill resulting from litigation with Plaintiffs-Respondents Jack Key and Jack Key Motor Company, Inc. (Key) in the district court. Although the district court found that Chrysler incurred reasonable and necessary expenses, the district court significantly reduced the entire award and disallowed costs for computer-assisted legal research. Key appealed the order, and Chrysler cross-appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the district court’s reduction of costs and disallowance of costs for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District v. Michael F. B/n/f/ Mr. And Mrs. Barry F.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. H-B-S Partnership v. Aircoa Hospitality Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Roark v. Farmers Group, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Reed v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Harris v. VasquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API