Legal Opinion

San Mateo County Human Services Agency v. Kia E.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 2014No. A139117PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

In this dependency appeal, Kia E. (mother) seeks relief from the juvenile court order terminating the discretionary reunification services she was receiving pursuant to subdivision (b)(3) of section 361.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.1 Specifically, mother claims that the services offered to her were unreasonable and therefore termination of those services was improper. There appears to have been some confusion in the juvenile court regarding the appropriate legal standards to apply when a dependent minor has been placed with a noncustodial parent pursuant to section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Mervin v. Gustave G.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Bridget A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. San Francisco Human Servs. Agency v. Christine C. (In re Caden C.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Sergio D. (In re Destiny D.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. In re I.A. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. In re Mohammed A. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. In re Z.R. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API