Legal Opinion
San Francisco Human Servs. Agency v. Christine C. (In re Caden C.)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 9, 2019No. A153925; A154042PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanchez, J.
*91We are familiar with this dependency proceeding, having previously reviewed and upheld several prior court orders in the matter, including the juvenile court's decision to set a permanency planning hearing pursuant to section 366.26 of the Welfare and Institutions Code1 for then seven-year-old Caden C. ( C.C. v. Superior Court (Aug. 28, 2017, A151400 [nonpub. opn.].) 2017 WL 3700807 At the permanency planning hearing in early 2018, the juvenile court determined that Christine C. (mother) had established a beneficial relationship with Caden under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i),…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. Patricia J.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Kimberly G.California Court of Appeal · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- C.C. v. Superior Court CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re A.B. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re A.E. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re A.N. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re A.Q. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.