Legal Opinion

Buhl v. Bak

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1987No. 15113Published

1Opinion of the Court

400 N.W.2d 903 (1987)

Harvey BUHL, G.R. Anderson, and Thomas M. Maher, individually and doing business as BAM, a partnership, Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

Robert BAK, Doing Business as Bak Construction, Defendant, and

John Bothwell, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 15113.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Considered on Briefs September 18, 1986.

Decided February 18, 1987.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1987.

Patricia A. Meyers of May, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, Pierre, for defendant and appellant Bothwell.

Charles Poches, Jr. of Poches & Lee, Fort Pierre, for plaintiffs and appellees.

FOSHEIM, Retired Justice.

A…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. North River Insurance Co. v. Golden Rule Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Sioux Falls v. Henry Carlson Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System v. MussallemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re Petition of S. R. A. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API