Legal Opinion

Dorchester Trust Co. v. Casey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 26, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract against the principals and sureties on a joint and several statutory bond given by the defendants to the plaintiff for the purpose of dissolving an attachment on real estate made in a former action against thp principals. The defendants Cerussi and Gradone were the principals named in the bond, and the defendants Johnson and Casey were the sureties. The judgment in the former action on which the bond to dissolve the attachment was given has not been satisfied either in whole or in part. Pending negotiations in the former action one Gaffney, attorney for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. T. Stearns Lumber Co. v. HowlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Commonwealth v. GettiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Lord Electric Co. v. MorrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Morrison v. Tremont Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. JenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Friend Lumber Co. v. Armstrong Building Finish Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Hale v. WilmarthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Dentman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API